Friday, July 15, 2011

Yep

The man knows Rupert like few others.



This also is interesting:

There will be many moves before Tuesday's date with Parliament...including much practicing for Rupert. I've seen this: they drill him. He can't stay on script without endless repetition.


I suggest someone like Tom Watson (the MP not the golfer) go at things from angles ol' Rupert hasn't prepared to obfuscate about.

Oh and when Rupert -- as he did yesterday -- claims "I COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAVE KNOWN" here's a nugget from the last time he testified under oath before Parliament.

Rupert Murdoch said he was "hands-on both economically and editorially" with his newspapers on the last occasion he gave evidence to a British parliamentary committee, the Press Association reports.

The media tycoon told the Lords communications committee four years ago that he was a "traditional proprietor" of the News of the World and the Sun, and decided their stance on issues such as Europe and which party to back in a general election.


That was four years ago during the height of phone hacking, BTW.

Yesterday he stated:

He said, however, that he attends to a lot of details in a multi-billion company with thousands of employees.


Funny how he's hands on, except -- of course -- when it might get his ass in personal trouble.

He'll pretty much be the living embodiment of Goya's famous painting of Saturn devouring his children over the next few days.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Funny how he's hands on, except -- of course -- when it might get his ass in personal trouble."

Rupus is hardly unique in this respect. Pretty much every obscenely overpaid CEO follows the same script.

They deserve every cent they get because mere mortals couldn't possibly manage an organization as massive and complex as theirs.

But when it all goes horribly wrong, they're blameless because no single person could be expected to keep on top of everything in a organization so massive and complex—much less know what their sycophantic subordinates were doing in their name.

pansypoo said...

'plausible' deniability.

Anonymous said...

Sorry pansypoo, it's not plausible.

Anonymous said...

How did the arrogance and greed of (not just) media tycoons remove the once honored concept of duty to the public trust?
Tacitus put it well a couple of milleniums back: The strong negotiate from arrogance and greed...
and some got decapitated for so doing.
vox

pansypoo said...

i did put it in quotes.