Friday, August 27, 2004

Our Preznit Isn't Learnin'

One of the most idiotic interviews given by an American President (probably ably assisted with the involvement of Elisabeth Bumiller):

Item #1: Still cannot Say "I was wrong":

Mr. Bush also acknowledged for the first time that he made a "miscalculation of what the conditions would be'' in postwar Iraq. But he insisted that the 17-month-long insurgency that has upended the administration's plans for the country was the unintended by-product of a "swift victory'' against Saddam Hussein's military, which fled and then disappeared into the cities, enabling them to mount a rebellion against the American forces far faster than Mr. Bush and his aides had anticipated.

He insisted that his strategy had been "flexible enough'' to respond, and said that even now "we're adjusting to our conditions'' in places like Najaf, where American forces have been battling one of the most militant of the Shiite groups opposing the American-installed government.

Mr. Bush deflected efforts to inquire further into what went wrong with the occupation, suggesting that such questions should be left to historians, and insisting, as his father used to, that he would resist going "on the couch'' to rethink decisions.



Yes, George its been brilliantly adjusted to, I think we can see that. Why rethink decisions made without thought in the first place. After all, not thinking never leads to miscalculations does it?

Item #2:

On environmental issues, Mr. Bush appeared unfamiliar with an administration report delivered to Congress on Wednesday that indicated that emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases were the only likely explanation for global warming over the last three decades.


I believe the technically accurate response would be, "the President put his hands over his ears and said, "la la la I can't hear you."

As a supplement, Mr. Bush said:

Asked why the administration had changed its position on what causes global warming, Mr. Bush replied, "Ah, we did? I don't think so."


T-o-o S-t-u-p-i-d t-o b-e P-r-e-s-i-d-e-n-t!

Item #3:

Mr. Bush also took issue with Mr. Kerry's argument, in an interview at the end of May with The New York Times, that the Bush administration's focus on Iraq had given North Korea the opportunity to significantly expand its nuclear capability. Showing none of the alarm about the North's growing arsenal that he once voiced regularly about Iraq, he opened his palms and shrugged when an interviewer noted that new intelligence reports indicate that the North may now have the fuel to produce six or eight nuclear weapons.

He said that in North Korea's case, and in Iran's, he would not be rushed to set deadlines for the countries to disarm, despite his past declaration that he would not "tolerate'' nuclear capability in either nation. He declined to define what he meant by "tolerate.''

"I don't think you give timelines to dictators,'' Mr. Bush said, speaking of North Korea's president, Kim Jong Il, and Iran's mullahs.


No timelines to dictators? Gee, I guess Iraq under Hussein was more democratic than we were led to believe.

Item #4:

"I'm confident that over time this will work - I certainly hope it does,''


Well, that is comforting.

Item #5:

But when pressed repeatedly if he would specifically denounce the advertisements, which Mr. Kerry has said were being run with the tacit approval of the Bush campaign, the president refused to condemn then. Instead, he said he would talk only of the "broader issue'' of the political committees that take to the airwaves with attack advertisements.

"Five twenty-sevens - I think these ought to be outlawed,'' he said. "I think they should have been outlawed a year ago. We have billionaires writing checks, large checks, to influence the outcome of the election.''


Would someone please explain the FIRST AMENDMENT to the Simpleton-in-Chief please?

No comments: